Things I find while I research

Read last sentence of the first paragraph.  Click the image for larger version:

Comments

  1. Mary Ruth says:

    Gotta love those railroad maggots.

  2. Richard Cartwright says:

    Proofreading is dead, killed by spellcheckers and eaten by railroad maggots. (Too much?)

  3. That’s really beyond a misspelling. How do you get maggots from magnates? What kind of spellcheck function is that? Maybe it’s the writer first, the editor second. Still, it’s pretty funny…

  4. Heh heh!

  5. Darn, who can compete with heavy burden of railroad maggots history…? :)

  6. My job as a copy editor is secure. Well, as long as someone values not having horrendous typos.
    Arthemise recently posted..Almost Halloween HD

  7. Chris, Head Zookeeper@The WilsonZoo says:

    Maggots, magnates, same difference, right?

  8. I bet a lot of the railroad workers would have agreed with the description of the owners as maggots! heehee

    Love Queen Anne architecture. One of my all-time favorite styles.

  9. I agree with LynneW. Looks like a Freudian slip, to me :)

  10. That reads like a true Freudian slip to me.

  11. I couldn’t even come up with the word “magnate” once I read maggot. From now on, whenever I see or hear the word magnate I will think “maggot”.

  12. Lol. For a second there I thought “railroad maggot” was some kind of legit description I just never heard before. But nope, just a funny typo.

  13. Accurate as written.

  14. Trish Henry says:

    Awesome and perfectly true!

  15. Didn’t they have railroad maggots on CSI a few weeks back?

    Gotta love homonyms.

    • (Though technically, since “maggot” and “magnate” aren’t really pronounced the same way, they’re not homonyms.)

  16. WTF LMAO ahahhahahahahahahahaa

  17. Darn. This will be imbedded in my brain now and I will probably forevermore substitute maggot for magnate.

    This was funny but, sadly, typos are pervasive in all media.

  18. Freudian slip, typo or intentional, it seems a lot of folks equate the two. It seems to exert a magnateic attraction.

  19. I was reading it thinking, ‘What?’ but my head is fuzzy with flu, still there could be maggots – maybe the writer was just expressing personal opinion…
    Chantal Halpin recently posted..Isn’t it cool when…

  20. smileygirl3090 says:

    I actually couldn’t work out what the author should have written until I read other peoples comments… I was sat their stumped thinking, is this some weird term for railroad workers? How can they all afford houses like that? Magnates makes more sense…

  21. nuitblanche' says:

    I was wondering; do maggots only each decaying flesh say from the unfortunate rail hitching drifters and unwitting, familiarly targeted lumbar barons after they hatch into grubs? Or do they ever acquire a taste for wood and those lovely Victorian Houses owned by the maggots themselves (eating themselves out of house and home, so to speak) and sometimes those greedy, untitled barons who kicked the bucket prematurely?

  22. Sara K. says:

    Freudian slip, IMO………..

  23. Cheryl Mason says:

    I guess the railroad maggots put in the “bone charring bumps” in the level crossing in the middle of our city. Yes, that is a direct quote from the op-ed page of the daily newspaper 6 months after I was turned down for a proof-reading position at said newspaper! I never did find any burnt bones.

  24. *snort*

  25. Dingo Baby says:

    Maggots, magnates,
    To-maa-to, to-mah-to

    That was quite funny.